Haha! That’s a unique approach! While randomness can be fun, a more structured method can lead to consistent results. But hey, whatever gets the creative juices flowing!
I’ve always found it beneficial to use the equalizer first. This way, I can shape the tone of the sound before compression, which often helps in achieving a more controlled dynamic range.
5 Likes
That’s interesting, Adam! I’ve tried both ways. It seems like when I compress first, it keeps things tight, but I lose some of the tonal definition. Anyone else have differing experiences?
In my setup, I put the compressor first when working with vocals. It seems to capture the nuances better, which is crucial in a dense mix. I’d be curious to hear if others have had similar results!
I can see the logic there, Sheri! It really depends on what you’re aiming for. What do you usually mix with? I’d love to know more about your vocal chain!
Honestly, I play around with both orders in my mixes. Sometimes it’s about the genre—heavy genres might call for compressor first, while acoustic sets work better with EQ first.
Very true, Nathaniel! I’ve noticed similar outcomes. It’s almost like you’re feeling the vibe—what works for one song may not work for another. Do you have a go-to genre that guides your choice?
I prefer putting the equalizer last in my setup. This allows me to clean up anything the compressor might have emphasized unnecessarily. It’s all about balance in the end!
That’s a solid approach! But how do you deal with any potential phase issues? I always wonder if adjusting post-compression might introduce some unwanted artifacts.
4 Likes
Haha, I think I’m with you, David! It’s like playing a game of ‘who’s the boss’—is it the compressor or the EQ? Let’s just call it a friendly rivalry and see who wins in the mix!
6 Likes