Both models can be a bit pricey, but I’d still recommend trying both at a store before making a decision. You want to find what feels best for you in the long run.
I’ve played both guitars, and I’ve got to say, the Little Martin is built with solid mahogany, which gives it a warm, rich sound. The Taylor GS Mini, on the other hand, uses layered woods which might be less durable over time. I think it really depends on what you prioritize: sound or durability.
That’s a great point! The aesthetics of both guitars are also worth noting. The Little Martin has a classic look, while the Taylor GS Mini has a more modern appeal. It really comes down to personal taste!
I love the GS Mini’s scalability! It’s easy to take on the go. However, I’ve noticed it might not have the depth of sound the Little Martin offers due to its construction. Does anyone else feel like travel guitars sacrifice sound quality?
I think they do, but not always! I play a Taylor GS Mini and in my experience, it still sounds fantastic despite being smaller. Plus, the playability is top-notch!
I’ve had my Little Martin for a few years now and the sound has only gotten better with age! The solid wood definitely contributes to its longevity. I’d put my money on it for durability any day.
2 Likes
Absolutely! But has anyone had issues with the finish on the Taylor? I’ve heard that layered wood can sometimes show wear more quickly.
3 Likes
I think durability is a toss-up! Sure, the Little Martin is solid but if you’re careful, the GS Mini can hold its own. I wouldn’t say one is categorically better than the other. Just different.
Good point! The sound is subjective too. I find the GS Mini has a bright tone, while the Little Martin is mellower. What do others think about tone preference?
I personally think the GS Mini is like a small coffee cup: cute and fun but doesn’t have that robust flavor like a full mug (Little Martin) does! Anyone else feel this way or am I just craving coffee?