I get that. Sometimes, it takes a while to find the right setup, but the tonal versatility is worth it in the end!
I’m curious about how the P90s compare to the Burstbuckers in live situations. Anyone prefer one over the other? What about feedback issues?
I’ve used both, and honestly, it depends on the venue. The P90s can be bright and cutting, but they also tend to pick up more ambient noise. The Burstbuckers offer a thicker tone and handle volume better on stage.
That’s really interesting! I’ve noticed P90s can become muddy if there’s too much gain. Have you had any issues with that on stage?
Honestly, yes! But I’ve learned to adjust my tone settings when using P90s live. It’s all about balancing it for the room. Still love the sound though!
I once joked that the 2013 Les Paul Future has more tonal options than my car has gears! But seriously, the tonal diversity is something to truly appreciate.
Haha, that’s a great way to put it! It definitely keeps you experimenting, and sometimes surprises you in the best ways.
I’ve had my 2013 Gibson Les Paul Future for a few years now, and I have to say it offers great tonal versatility. The blend of features makes it competitive in today’s market, but pricing can be hit or miss depending on where you shop.
3 Likes
I agree, the tonal versatility is solid! However, I feel like compared to other models like the Standard, the price might be a bit too high for some.
The 2013 model has some unique features, like the adjustable bridge and fine-tuning tuners, which I think add value. In my research, these features really set it apart in the market.
Exactly! But do those features really justify its price? I’m curious what other users think—are they functional or just gimmicky?
4 Likes
I think the features are quite practical, especially in live settings. That said, user feedback seems to indicate mixed feelings about reliability over time. It’s worth considering, depending on your usage.
Honestly, if you’re looking for value, the 2013 model still holds strong in resale value compared to other brands. This durability is a plus if you’re looking to invest.
That’s true! But I’ve also seen some lower-priced options that perform just as well. Are we paying for the brand, or the quality?
I’m all for a brand, but sometimes it feels like we’re paying for a name with these guitars. The features are cool, but are they actually better than a $1,000 guitar? 
For me, it’s about performance. If it sounds great and plays well, it could be worth it. A lot comes down to personal preference.
I think it’s important to try one out yourself. User feedback varies, and while I love mine, not everyone has the same experience, especially regarding weight and playability.
You make a good point! Plus, the weight can be a dealbreaker for some. I’ve seen some guys joke that the 2013 model comes with a gym membership! 
7 Likes
Haha, no kidding! But seriously, whether you want a Les Paul or a lighter model depends on your style and playing needs.
At the end of the day, if you’re passionate about it and it enhances your playing, then I think it’s worth whatever you’re willing to spend. Let your heart decide! 